Table. 5.
Results of logistic regression models predicting visiting the DrinkWise website
| OR (95 % CI) | p | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 1.00 | |
| Female | 0.23 (0.08–0.63) | .004 |
| Age | Wald χ 2 p = .304 | |
| 18–24 | 1.00 | |
| 25–34 | 0.80 (0.27–2.38) | .682 |
| 35–45 | 0.46 (0.15–1.42) | .176 |
| Education | ||
| Less than tertiary | 1.00 | |
| Tertiary or above | 1.27 (0.50–3.26) | .613 |
| Binge drinking | 1.56 (1.07–2.78) | .022 |
| Main alcoholic drink | Wald χ 2 p = .004 | |
| Beer | 1.00 | |
| Wine | 10.25 (3.35–33.36) | <.001 |
| Spirits | 6.23 (1.57–24.73) | .009 |
| Pre-mix | 0.77 (0.08–7.87) | .827 |
| Cider | 2.45 (0.16–38.05) | .520 |
| Other | 2.78 (0.24–32.27) | .413 |
| Drink directly from can or bottle | ||
| Never/not often | 1.00 | |
| At least sometimes | 3.50 (1.11–11.02) | .032 |
| Support for health warning labels | ||
| Neutral or opposed | 1.00 | |
| Support/strongly support | 4.27 (1.09–16.80) | .038 |
| Recognition of the ‘Get the facts’ logo | ||
| No | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 7.25 (2.50–21.01) | <.001 |
Note. Data weighted by age, sex, and state of residence