Table 1.
Comparison of results using QIAxcel vs. ABI PRISM methods
| Allele | MS4 | MS6 | MS9 | MS15 | MS20 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABI | QIAxcel | ABI | QIAxcel | ABI | QIAxcel | ABI | QIAxcel | ABI | QIAxcel | |
| 1 | 187 (0.19) | 190 (0.08) | 210 (0.63) | 219 (0.39) | 147 (0.19) | 156 (0.19) | 243 (0.69) | 247 (0.24) | 200 (0.1) | 209 (0.04) |
| 2 | 193 (0.63) | 191 (0.08) | 229 (0.33) | 220 (0.18) | 155 (0.04) | 165 (0.11) | 249 (0.14) | 248 (0.45) | 206 (0.2) | 210 (0.07) |
| 3 | 200 (0.19) | 192 (0.04) | 221 (0.07) | 157 (0.11) | 166 (0.04) | 258 (0.17) | 254 (0.14) | 220 (0.07) | 211 (0.04) | |
| 4 | 197 (0.32) | 233 (0.04) | 163 (0.67) | 172 (0.60) | 262 (0.17) | 222 (0.63) | 216 (0.15) | |||
| 5 | 198 (0.36) | 237 (0.14) | 173 (0.07) | 218 (0.04) | ||||||
| 6 | 203 (0.08) | 238 (0.18) | 221 (0.04) | |||||||
| 7 | 204 (0.04) | 230 (0.44) | ||||||||
| 8 | 231 (0.19) | |||||||||
The table shows the base pair size of each allele. In parentheses the frequencies of each allele are denoted