Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 20;10(8):e0135389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135389

Table 3. Results of model averaging for three best-fit (within 2 AIC) models for the dependence of frog parameters on the probability of Bd detection as response variable in generalized linear mixed models, (Table 2; n = 52 frogs, 104 samples).

Individual frog ID was included as a random factor. Individuals without mass data available (n = 6) were excluded from the analysis.

Parameter(s) Estimate SE Z Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) 0.513 0.651 0.780 0.435
Live ZE 0.082 0.045 1.810 0.070
Extract (PM) -2.274 0.782 2.874 0.004**
Extract (PM) * Live ZE 0.013 0.038 0.351 0.725
Frog Mass 0.0004 0.002 0.319 0.750

**p<0.01