Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 20;10(8):e0136322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136322

Table 2. Summary results of bivariate model analysis and univariable/multivariable meta-regression.

Bivariate model analysis
Sen (95%CI) I 2 Sen (95%CI) Spe (95%CI) I 2 Spe (95%CI) PLR (95%CI) NLR (95%CI) DOR (95%CI) AUROC (95%CI)
0.39 (0.21–0.61) 80.27 (67.25–93.30) 0.98 (0.87–1.00) 95.67 (93.82–97.53) 16.6 (4.5–61.5) 0.62 (0.46–0.85) 27 (9–81) 0.77 (0.73–0.80)
Univariable meta-regression Multivariable meta-regression
Parameter No. of study Sen (95%CI) P Sen Spe (95%CI) P Spe I 2 (95%CI) P I 2
Stage 0.64 <0.001 0 (0–100) 0.66
 I-IV 5 0.35 (0.09–0.62) 0.99 (0.96–1.00)
 III,IV 3 0.47 (0.15–0.79) 0.95 (0.82–1.00)
Patient size 0.03 0.07 62 (13–100) 0.07
 ≥100 5 0.28 (0.12–0.45) 0.99 (0.98–1.00)
 <100 3 0.66 (0.45–0.87) 0.85 (0.62–1.00)
Sampling time 0.55 0.02 0 (0–100) 0.68
 Before treatment 7 0.37 (0.14–0.59) 0.98 (0.93–1.00)
 After treatment 1 0.51 (0.00–1.00) 0.96 (0.81–1.00)
Methods 0.48 0.40 0 (0–100) 0.79
 CLIA 5 0.35 (0.11–0.58) 0.98 (0.95–1.00)
 ELISA 3 0.49 (0.15–0.84) 0.96 (0.84–1.00)
Ethnicity 0.21 <0.001 48 (0–100) 0.15
 Japanese 5 0.30 (0.08–0.52) 0.99 (0.98–1.00)
 Chinese 3 0.58 (0.30–0.86) 0.88 (0.65–1.00)

Sen sensitivity; Spe specificity; PLR positive likelihood ratios; NLR negative likelihood ratios; DOR diagnostic odds ratios; AUROC area under receiver operating curve; CLIA chemiluminescence immunoassays; ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay