Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Res Q Exerc Sport. 2015 Mar 9;86(3):303–310. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2015.1008965

Table 1.

Observed PANES mean item scores by neighborhood type.

Item Number and Content Single-Family
Housing (N=147)
Mean (SD)
Multi-Family
Housing (N=177)
Mean (SD)
Effect Size*
PANES 2: Places to buy things are within easy walking distance of home. 2.2 (1.2) 2.8 (1.1) 0.23
PANES 3: 10-15 minutes walk to a transit stop from home. 2.9 (1.3) 3.4 (1.0) 0.24
PANES 4: Sidewalks on most of streets in neighborhood. 3.3 (1.1) 3.5 (0.9) 0.07
PANES 5: Facilities to bicycle in or near neighborhood. 2.5 (1.3) 2.6 (1.2) 0.01
PANES 6: Neighborhood has several free or low cost recreation facilities. 3.1 (1.1) 3.0 (1.1) 0.03
PANES 7: Crime rate in neighborhood makes it unsafe to walk at night. 2.5 (1.2) 2.8 (1.1) 0.14
PANES 8: Traffic makes it difficult or unpleasant to walk in neighborhood. 2.1 (1.1) 2.4 (1.1) 0.17
PANES 9: See many people being physically active in neighborhood. 2.9 (1.0) 3.0 (1.0) 0.04
PANES 10: Many interesting things to look at while walking in neighborhood. 2.4 (1.1) 2.5 (1.1) 0.06
PANES 12: Many four-way intersections in neighborhood. 2.8 (1.1) 2.9 (1.0) 0.05
PANES 13: Sidewalks in neighborhood are maintained and not obstructed. 2.9 (1.2) 2.7 (1.1) 0.10
PANES 14: Places for bicycling in neighborhood are maintained and not obstructed. 2.4 (1.3) 2.3 (1.1) 0.02
PANES 15: Traffic makes it difficult or unpleasant to bicycle in neighborhood. 2.2 (1.1) 2.7 (1.1) 0.23
PANES 16: Crime in neighborhood makes it unsafe to walk during the day. 1.8 (0.9) 2.2 (1.0) 0.22
PANES 17: Many places to go within easy walking distance of home. 2.6 (1.2) 2.8 (1.1) 0.10

Items are rated by respondents using a four-category Likert-type scale from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree.

*

Effect size for Wilcoxon rank sum comparisons between neighborhood types: “small” effect = 0.10–0.29; “medium” effect = 0.30–0.49; “large” effect ≥0.50.