Table 3.

Results of testing sequentially nested models for increasingly more restrictive forms of factorial invariance.

Model	Type of Invariance	NNFI	CFI	SRMR	RMSEA (90% CI)	Closeness-of-fit p-value	df	SBχ2*
1	Configural	.983	.987	.088	.038 (.016 – .055)	.871	162	200.13
2	First-order loadings	.974	.978	.106	.048 (.031 – .062)	.596	173	235.80
Model 2 vs. 1		−.009	−.009				11	98.76
3	Second-order loadings	.969	.974	.117	.052 (.037 – .066)	.410	176	251.81
Model 3 vs. 1		−.002	−.013				14	132.37
4	Item intercepts	.954	.958	.119	.063 (.063 – .075)	.047	191	313.23
Model 4 vs. 1		−.018	−.029				29	358.83
4A	Partial invariance of item intercepts	.964	.968	.116	.056 (.042 – .069)	.226	187	281.45
Model 4A vs. 1		−.006	−.019				25	205.53

^*Satorra-Bentler scaled chi square, which was not used directly in testing model fit, but was used in the computation of the other fit indices.