Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 21;10(8):e0132149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132149

Table 3. Detailed overview of the results comparing the direct and indirect method, expressed as percentages for each of 5 types of samples.

Categories Throat (IC) Throat (H) Rectal (IC) Rectal (H) Vaginal (G) Total
Total number of samples 100 11 100 63 73 347
Negative with both methods (%) 25.0 72.7 55.0 61.9 76.7 52.8
Positive with both methods (1 species) (%) 41.0 9.1 26.0 12.7 17.8 25.6
Candida albicans 34.0 0.0 19.0 4.8 12.3 18.7
C. dubliniensis 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.4 1.4
C. glabrata 1.0 9.1 3.0 1.6 4.1 2.6
C. guilliermondii 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.3
C. parapsilosis 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 1.2
C. robusta 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.6 0.0 0.9
C. tropicalis 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.3
Geotrichum silvicola 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.3
Positive with both methods (2 or more species) (%) 12.0 0.0 6.0 1.6 0.0 5.5
C. albicans/C. dubliniensis 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3
C. albicans/C. glabrata 7.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 3.5
C. glabrata/C. krusei 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.6
C. glabrata/C. lusitaniae 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3
C. kefyr/C. parapsilosis/Pichia manshurica 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.3
C. parapsilosis/C. robusta 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6
Discrepancies (%) 22.0 18.2 13.0 23.8 5.5 16.1

Legend: IC: Intensive Care, H: Haematology, G: Gynaecology.