Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 3;112(33):10503–10508. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423036112

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

(A) Shown is percentage correct for recognition of the target image averaged across 40 sessions from 25 patients (n = 40) split into low and high performers. (B) Shown is the memory performance for lure images as measured by the discrimination index score (p(“New”|Lure) – p(“New”|Target)). A discrimination index score of 1 would be the maximal possible score, indicating high performance on the memory task. Lure 1 = most similar and lure 3 = least similar to the target photograph.