Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD009085. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009085.pub2

Summary of findings 2. Intermittent versus daily use of iron supplements in children younger than 12 years of age.

Patient or population: children under 12 years of age
 Settings: community settings
 Intervention: intermittent supplementation with iron alone or with other micronutrients
 Comparison: daily supplementation with iron alone or with other micronutrients
Outcomes Relative effect 
 (95% CI) No of Participants 
 (studies) Quality of the evidence 
 (GRADE)
Anaemia (haemoglobin below a cut‐off defined by trialists, taking into account the age and altitude) RR 1.23 
 (1.04–1.47) 980
 (6 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2
Haemoglobin (g/L) MD –0.60 
 (–1.54‐0.35) 2851
(19 studies)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,3
Iron deficiency (using ferritin concentrations) RR 4.00 
 (1.23–13.05)
 
76
 (1 study) ⊝⊝⊝⊝
 very low4
Iron status (ferritin (µg/L) MD –4.19
(–9.42‐ 1.05)
 
902
(10 studies)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1 3
Iron deficiency anaemia Not estimable 0
 (0 studies) None of the trials reported on this outcome
Mortality Not estimable 0
 (0 studies) None of the trials reported on this outcome
CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio; MD, mean difference.
*GRADE Working Group grades of evidence:
 High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
 Moderate quality: We have moderate confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
 Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
 Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
1 Some studies lacked blinding and clear methods of allocation.
2 Wide confidence intervals.
3 High heterogeneity but results were mostly consistent.
4 Only one trial with unclear methods to generate the random sequence and conceal the allocation. Wide confidence intervals.
Note: For cluster‐randomised trials the analyses only include the estimated effective sample size, after adjusting the data to account for the clustering effect.