Summary of findings 2. Intermittent versus daily use of iron supplements in children younger than 12 years of age.
Patient or population: children under 12 years of age Settings: community settings Intervention: intermittent supplementation with iron alone or with other micronutrients Comparison: daily supplementation with iron alone or with other micronutrients | |||
Outcomes | Relative effect (95% CI) | No of Participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) |
Anaemia (haemoglobin below a cut‐off defined by trialists, taking into account the age and altitude) | RR 1.23 (1.04–1.47) | 980 (6 studies) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2 |
Haemoglobin (g/L) | MD –0.60 (–1.54‐0.35) | 2851 (19 studies) |
⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,3 |
Iron deficiency (using ferritin concentrations) |
RR 4.00
(1.23–13.05) |
76 (1 study) | ⊝⊝⊝⊝ very low4 |
Iron status (ferritin (µg/L) |
MD –4.19 (–9.42‐ 1.05) |
902 (10 studies) |
⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1 3 |
Iron deficiency anaemia | Not estimable | 0 (0 studies) | None of the trials reported on this outcome |
Mortality | Not estimable | 0 (0 studies) | None of the trials reported on this outcome |
CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio; MD, mean difference. *GRADE Working Group grades of evidence: High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate quality: We have moderate confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. | |||
1 Some studies lacked blinding and clear methods of allocation. 2 Wide confidence intervals. 3 High heterogeneity but results were mostly consistent. 4 Only one trial with unclear methods to generate the random sequence and conceal the allocation. Wide confidence intervals. Note: For cluster‐randomised trials the analyses only include the estimated effective sample size, after adjusting the data to account for the clustering effect. |