Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Dec 10;24(6):778–786. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.530707

Table II.

Characteristics of included studies

Year First Author Total population Total w/ bleeding (%)* Study design Definition of Bleeding
1980 Funderburk[16] 25,377 259 (1.0%) Population sample. Record review, not otherwise specified, presumed retrospective At least one episode of spotting
1983 Berkowitz[6] 16,305 2,385 (14.6%) Population sample. Retrospective review of post-partum questionnaire Greater or less then menses
1984 Batzofin[17] 7,229 523 (7.2%) Population sample. Record review, not otherwise specified, presumed retrospective Deemed significant by provider
1985 Hertz[5] 375 93 Convenience sample Presumed prospective, though unclear “Threatened abortion” defined as vaginal bleeding with or without cramps
1989 Strobino[8] 3,346 744 (22.2%) Population sample Prospective after second trimester interview At least “spotting or slight” for “Light” and “characterized as moderate or heavy” for “Heavy”
1992 Sipila[19] 8,718 807 (9.3%) Population sample Questionnaire at 24 wks then prospective collection of delivery data “Light” subgroup did not require hospital care “Heavy” subgroup had been admitted.
1991 Williams[18] 11,444 1,174 (12%) Population sample Retrospective review of post-partum questionnaire Present or absent only
1993 Verma[9] 113 63 Convenience sample Unclear if retrospective or prospective Clinically diagnosed with “threatened abortion”
1995 Tongsong[26] 520 255 Convenience sample Prospective with subjects enrolled at the time of bleeding Vaginal bleeding sufficient for an ultrasound to have been ordered
1996 Das[7] 110 55 Convenience sample Presumed prospective Vaginal bleeding sufficient for ultrasound examination
1998 Karim[27] 268 95 Convenience sample retrospective medial record review Present or absent only
1998 Signore[28] 334 167 Convenience sample retrospective chart review Vaginal bleeding sufficient for ultrasound examination
1999 French[20] 1,169 190 (15.8%) Population sample Secondary analysis of prospective trial Not defined
2000 Arafa[21] 1,503 159 (10.6%) Population sample Interviewed postpartum “Light”: one episode of spotting; “Heavy”: > 1 teaspoon
2001 Yang[15] 8671 308 (4.3%) Population sample Retrospective review of questionnaire Sufficient for Bed rest**
2003 Harville[23] 136 14 (8.8%) Population sample Prospective patient log Requires a pad for at at least a day
2004 Mulik[13] 6,903 458 (6.6%) Population sample Retospective analysis of database Not defined
2004 Yang[14] 2,802 683 (24.3%) Population sample Questionnaire at 24–29 Weeks, prospective Any bleeding or spotting
2004 Weiss[24] 16,506 2,346 (14.2%) Population sample Secondary analysis of prospective study. 1st trimester questionnaire “Light”: Spotting only “Heavy”: Similar to menses
2006 Wijesiriwardana[12] 39,260 7,627 (19.4%) Population sample. “Retrospective cohort” Sufficient for subjects to seek hospital assessment prior to 12 weeks
2006 Johns[29] 214 214 Convenience sample Prospective Vaginal bleeding sufficient for referral, “spotting” was excluded
2007 Hossain[25] 2,678 622 (26.2%) Population sample. Interview prior to 20 wks, then data collected prospectively Present or absent only
2008 Davari-Tanha[30] 600 150 Convenience sample Prospective Not defined
*

The percent incidence of vaginal bleeding is only provided for studies that utilized a population sample.

**

”1st half of pregnancy” and “more severe” subgroups were selected from many different available subgroups for meta-analysis as this was most similar to other included studies