Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 19;11:2109–2116. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S87703

Table 3.

Predicting laboratory heat pain tolerance and intensity by CTQ subscale scores using hierarchical regression analyses (N=62)

Heat pain tolerance
Heat pain intensity
b SE of b β P-value b SE of b β P-value
Step 1
 Age −0.04 0.03 −0.22 P=0.197 −0.01 0.03 −0.07 P=0.688
 Body mass index −0.07 0.06 −0.15 P=0.262 −0.05 0.06 −0.11 P=0.418
 Menstrual cycle phase −0.11 0.22 −0.09 P=0.611 0.12 0.19 0.11 P=0.519
Step 2
 Age −0.04 0.03 −0.22 P=0.197 −0.02 0.03 −0.12 P=0.503
 Body mass index −0.07 0.07 −0.15 P=0.279 −0.03 0.06 −0.07 P=0.648
 Menstrual cycle phase −0.23 0.22 −0.18 P=0.306 0.08 0.20 0.07 P=0.690
 Emotional abuse −0.28 0.13 −0.62 P=0.034 −0.14 0.11 −0.36 P=0.218
 Physical abuse −0.05 0.17 −0.08 P=0.753 −0.10 0.15 −0.16 P=0.535
 Sexual abuse 0.11 0.09 0.21 P=0.203 0.14 0.08 0.30 P=0.075
 Emotional neglect 0.21 0.12 0.45 P=0.095 0.19 0.11 0.47 P=0.093
 Physical neglect −0.04 0.25 −0.05 P=0.863 −0.04 0.218 −0.05 P=0.852
R2=0.06 for step 1; ΔR2=0.10 for step 2, ns R2=0.05 for step 1; ΔR2=0.08 for step 2, ns

Notes: b= unstandardized regression coefficient; β= standardized regression coefficient; P= significance value; R2= total variance explained by the model; ΔR2= variance explained by CTQ subscales after adjusting for age, body mass index, and menstrual cycle phase.

Abbreviations: CTQ, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire; ns, not significant; SE, standard error.