Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 28;21(32):9494–9502. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9494

Table 1.

Published data of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS or HGS) (n > 20)

Ref. No. of patients Study design CDS or HGS Stent Technical success Complication rate Patency Complication
Park et al[9] 55 P CDS, HGS PS, MS 92, 100 21, 19 152, 132 Peritonitis, pneumoperitoneum, Bleeding
Hara et al[11] 18 P CDS PS 94 17 272 Peritonitis, hemobilia
Khashab et al[25] 20 R CDS, HGS PS, MS 100 10 - NA
Kawakubo et al[8] 64 R CDS, HGS PS, MS 95, 95 14, 30 - Bile leak, stent misplacement, bleeding
Hara et al[12] 18 P CDS MS 94 11 NR peritonitis
Vila et al[10] 65 R CDS, HGS NA 86, 65 15, 29 - Biloma, bleeding, perforation, pancreatitis, cholangitis, hematoma, abscess, pseudocyst
Dhir et al[13] 30 R CDS, HGS MS 92.3 20 - Cholangitis, perforation, bile leak, pneumoperitoneum, death

P: Prospective; R: Retrospective; CDS: Choledochoduodenostomy; HGS: Hepaticogastrostomy; PS: Plastic stent; MS: Metallic stent; NA: Not available; NR: Not reached.