Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 26;15:822. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2171-x

Table 5.

Meta-regression results of the impact of selected study-level variables on the meta-analysis estimates

Meta-analysis sub-group/predictor No. trials/studies Average estimate of effect (95 % CI) Adjusted R 2a
RCT-behaviour-SMD 10/10
 Dose (>1 vs. 1 exposure) 0.68 (0.03, 1.33) 44.6 %
UBA-knowledge-RR 22/20
 Document type (other vs. journal) 2.01 (1.18, 3.43) 19.3 %
UBA-behaviour-RR 20/17
 Target population engaged in intervention (yes vs. no) 1.47 (1.02, 2.11) 27.4 %

RCT randomized controlled trials, UBA uncontrolled before-and-after studies, SMD standardized mean difference (Hedges’ g), RR relative risk, CI confidence interval

aAdjusted R 2 refers to the proportion of between-study variance accounted for by the model