Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 15;5(7):2285–2293.

Table 3.

Univariate analysis of the association between clinicopathologic parameters or OCT2 level and chemotherapeutic response in the entire cohort

Variables No. Res. (%) Non-res. (%) P-value
Age (years)
    ≥ 60 38 22 (58) 16 (42) 0.77
    < 60 18 9 (50) 9 (50)
Sex
    Man 33 20 (61) 13 (39) 0.42
    Woman 23 11 (48) 12 (52)
Tumor localization1
    Proximal 26 14 (54) 12 (46) 1.00
    Non-proximal 30 17 (57) 13 (43)
Laurén classification2
    Intestinal 11 9 (82) 2 (18) 0.09
    Non-intestinal 45 22 (49) 23 (51)
Histologic grade2
    G1/G2 11 9 (82) 2 (18) 0.09
    G3/G4 45 22 (49) 23 (51)
HER2 status3
    Positive 2 1 (50) 1 (50) 1.00
    Negative 45 24 (53) 21 (47)
NAC regimen
    S-1/CDDP 28 17 (61) 11 (39) 0.59
    PTX/CDDP 28 14 (50) 14 (50)
OCT2 level
    High 41 26 (63) 15 (37) 0.07
    Low 15 5 (33) 10 (67)
1

Even when diffuse/entire vs. non-diffuse/entire was analyzed instead of proximal vs. non-proximal, a significant association was not detected;

2

Laurén classification and histologic grade data showed the same pattern;

3

Human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) was evaluable in 47 of the 56 patients.

OCT2: organic cation transporter 2; Res.: responder; Non-res.: non-responder; NAC: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; CDDP: cisplatin; PTX: paclitaxel.