Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 6;4(7):2058460115580877. doi: 10.1177/2058460115580877

Table 1.

Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics.

Period I (26 patients, 30 procedures) Period II (26 patients, 26 procedures) P value
Age (years, median (range)) 69 (34–82) 70 (40–85) ns
Gender, n (%)
 Male 15 (57.7 %) 12 (46.2 %) ns
 Female 11 14
Site of primary tumor (n)
 Colon 15 16 ns
 Rectum 11 10
Number of mucinous primary tumors 0 3 ns
Tumor grade of primary tumor
 High 4 9 ns
 Medium 22 14
 Low 0 3
Synchronous metastases 13 20 ns
Metachronous metastases 13 6
Indication for RFA
 Patient: Advanced age/co-morbidity 8 5 ns
 Tumor: Inadequate residual functioning liver parenchyma 18 21
 Number of ablated lesions 39* 31 ns
 Tumor size of ablated lesion (cm, median (range)) 1.5 (1.0–3.2) 1.4 (0.5–4.5) ns
RFA approach
 Percutaneous 7 9 ns
 Open surgical 23 17
Time from primary resection to RFA (months, median (range)) 17 (2–80) 9 (2–76) ns
Prior liver resection 6 12 ns
Concomitant liver resection 15 15 ns
Bilobar disease 16 14 ns
Number of lesions (ablated and resected lesions), median 2 2 ns
Size of largest lesion (cm, ablated or resected lesions), median 2.95 2.20 ns
CEA (ng/mL, median (range)) 9.9 (1.7–3414) 7.7 (0.5–145) ns
ASA III 6 9 ns
Median follow-up (months (range)) 34 (1–137) 33 (2–78) ns
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy 6 13 ns
Number of lines of chemotherapy before RFA, median (range) 13 (4–22) 4 (4–12)
Adjuvant chemotherapy 4 13 P = 0.017
*

Including three reablations.