Table 2.
Implementation outcomes and measures by Study Aim.
| Implementation Outcome |
Description | Measure Source | Measurement Schedule |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIM 1 | Penetration | Delivery of (i) BI and (ii) RT to those for whom indicated. |
CRAFFT+ and provider intervention items in EMR |
Ongoing for each encounter; administrative encounter data abstracted monthly |
| AIM 2 |
Cost and Cost- Effectiveness |
Cost of service delivery; Full implementation costs; ICERs for BI and RT. |
SASCAP, clinic records, organizational expenditures, budget |
Month 12 (clinic costs); Month 25 (full implementation costs) |
| AIM 3 | Acceptability | Provider attitudes, perceived need, self- competence |
Provider surveys; Qualitative Interviews |
Repeated each period (∼months 4, 15, and 30) |
| Timeliness | Delivery of services on the same day as screening vs. future appointment. |
Provider intervention items in EMR |
Ongoing for each encounter; administrative encounter data abstracted monthly |
|
| Adherence | Provider adherence to key components of the two SBIRT strategies (e.g., Generalist vs. Specialist) |
Provider intervention items in EMR; Qualitative interviews |
Complete after each encounter in which a BI is indicated |
|
| Satisfaction | Patient satisfaction with services |
Anonymous patient questionnaire |
Ongoing voluntary questionnaire for each BI/RT encounter. Data abstracted monthly. |
|
| Sustainability | Endurance of services after removal of support resources |
CRAFFT+ and provider intervention items in EMR |
Continued ongoing collection of administrative encounter data with monthly abstraction |
|
| AIM 4 |
Feasibility and Acceptability |
Incorporation of HIV risk behavior screening into the SBIRT process |
Provider surveys; Qualitative interviews |
Repeated each period |