Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Sin. 2014 Jul;24(3):1433–1459. doi: 10.5705/ss.2012.317

Table 1.

Simulation results for Models 1–4. (n, p, s) = (200, 1100, 44). Sensitivity, specificity, MCC, number of selected genes, number of false positives (FPs), and mean squared error (MSE) were averaged over 50 replicates. Lnet: Laplcian net; AdaLnet: adaptive Laplacian net; Lasso: ℓ1-penalty; Enet: elastic net; GL: group ℓγ-penalty. Standard errors are given in the Supplementary Material.

Method Sensitivity Specificity MCC # of genes # of FPs MSE
Model 1
Lnet 0.346 0.997 0.524 18.84 3.60 0.016
AdaLnet 0.395 0.996 0.559 21.47 4.09 0.016
Lasso 0.435 0.950 0.310 72.25 53.13 0.012
Enet 0.407 0.995 0.561 22.77 4.88 0.016
GLγ 0.233 0.998 0.431 12.66 2.42 0.015
Model 2
Lnet 0.442 0.996 0.600 23.54 4.09 0.015
AdaLnet 0.557 0.996 0.682 28.79 4.23 0.015
Lasso 0.465 0.958 0.362 64.32 43.88 0.011
Enet 0.616 0.991 0.675 36.68 9.58 0.015
GLγ 0.434 0.996 0.594 22.99 3.91 0.014
Model 3
Lnet 0.526 0.987 0.591 37.06 13.91 0.070
AdaLnet 0.624 0.995 0.715 33.24 5.77 0.071
Lasso 0.363 0.975 0.346 42.67 26.71 0.067
Enet 0.684 0.986 0.682 44.90 14.79 0.072
GLγ 0.437 0.999 0.633 20.26 1.05 0.070
Model 4
Lnet 0.446 0.996 0.601 24.34 4.71 0.070
AdaLnet 0.633 0.995 0.728 32.62 4.76 0.070
Lasso 0.407 0.974 0.376 45.66 27.76 0.063
Enet 0.661 0.988 0.684 41.96 12.88 0.072
GLγ 0.541 0.999 0.703 25.22 1.40 0.070