. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2015 Mar 16;27(3):997–1012. doi: 10.1037/a0038828

Table 5.

Results of the models tested with the second non-clinical sample (CFA) (N2= 9,067)

	M1	M2	M3	M4
χ ²	10091.40	6664.95	7009.88	7303.94
df	405	395	400	295
p	.000	.000	.000	.000
RMSEA	.098	.052	.054	.052
(CI 90%)	(.097-.098)	(.052-.053)	(.053-.055)	(.051-.053)
p	.000	.000	.000	.004
CFI	.92	.98	.98	.96
TLI	.91	.98	.97	.95
SRMR	.080	.047	.051	.024

Note: M1 = Unifactorial model; M2 = Five correlated factors model; M3 = Five first-order factors and one second-order factor model; M4 = ESEM (exploratory structural equation modeling).