Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2015 Mar 16;27(3):997–1012. doi: 10.1037/a0038828

Table 6.

Results of the models tested with the clinical sample (CFA) (N= 334)

M1 M2 M3 M4
χ 2 1562.17 812.52 859.26 375.30
df 405 395 400 295
p .000 .000 .000 .000
RMSEA .093 .056 .059 .040
(CI 90%) (.088-.098) (.051-.062) (.053-.064) (.027-.052)
p .000 .030 .000 .907
CFI .87 .95 .95 .96
TLI .86 .95 .94 .94
SRMR .100 .075 .079 .045

Note: M1 = Unifactorial model; M2 = Five correlated factors model; M3 = Five first-order factors and one second-order factor model; M4 = ESEM (exploratory structural equation modeling).