Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Emot. 2012 Aug 28;27(2):283–304. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.712948

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Differences between task performance in the context of facial distraction and task performance in the context of non-facial geometrical distraction for Experiment 2. Zero axis value indicates performance in the context of non-facial geometrical distraction. Positive values in the response latency indicates relative behavioural disruption, whereas negative values in percent correct indicates relative behavioural disruption.