Table 5.

Scaled scores^* on CNS-VS subtests^a from baseline to post-treatment

Subtests	Baseline scores (T1): Mean (S.D.)	Pre-treatment scores (T2): Mean (S.D.)	Post-treatment scores (T3): Mean (S.D.)	Repeated measures ANOVA			t-test: T1:T2		t-test: T2:T3
				Wilks' Lambda	p-Valueb	Effect size (η2)	t	p-Valuec	t	p-Valuec
Continuous performance task: commission errorsd	90.7 (22.6)	95.4 (18.1)	89.5 (25.8)	0.90	0.354	0.104
Continuous performance task: omission errors	85.0 (23.6)	84.4 (26.2)	88.4 (22.1)	0.95	0.628	0.048
Working memorye, 2-back: correct responses	81.1 (16.2)	81.6 (14.5)	90.8 (15.1)	0.64	0.014	0.363	–0.10	0.922	–3.24	0.004
Working memory, 2-back: incorrect responsesd	81.7 (28.1)	87.4 (23.6)	90.3 (20.4)	0.90	0.349	0.105
Shifting attention task: correct responses	62.3 (15.1)	70.5 (18.6)	77.4 (15.2)	0.30	0.0001	0.698	–2.76	0.012	–2.29	0.033
Shifting attention task: errors	79.7 (19.4)	85.6 (22.9)	97.3 (15.5)	0.45	0.001	0.547	–1.49	0.151	–2.91	0.009
Stroop: commission errors	79.2 (21.8)	83.0 (19.9)	81.4 (20.3)	0.98	0.793	0.024
Stroop: congruent condition, reaction timed to correct responses	66.7 (16.14)	70.4(20.1)	79.7 (18.5)	0.58	0.006	0.419	–1.16	0.261	–3.06	0.006
Stroop: incongruent condition, reaction time to correct responses	73.7 (21.9)	72.5 (21.1)	85.9 (16.7)	0.57	0.004	0.434	0.29	0.773	–3.77	0.001

^*Standardized scores were used for analysis.

^aWe reported subtests that comprised Bonferroni-corrected significant composite scores as described in Table 4.

^bp-Value ≤ .05.

^cBonferroni-corrected p-values ≤ .01.

^dAs raw scores for errors/incorrect responses/reaction time decreased, scaled scores increased.

^eFor clarity, we are referring to the CNS-VS, Four-Part CPT, as Working Memory since only the subtest score which measured Working Memory specifically, comprised the Working Memory domain.