Skip to main content
Ghana Medical Journal logoLink to Ghana Medical Journal
. 2015 Mar;49(1):2–6. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v49i1.1

Effect of Hepatitis B Virus Co-Infection on CD4 Cell Count and Liver Function of HIV Infected Patients

HO Olawumi 1, DO Olanrewaju 2, AO Shittu 1, IA Durotoye 1, AA Akande 3, A Nyamngee 4
PMCID: PMC4549810  PMID: 26339077

Summary

Background

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV) share similar routes of transmission, making it possible for an individual to have a co-infection. HBV infection is well known to be a major cause of chronic liver diseases worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of HBV infection among HIV infected HAART naïve patients and investigate the effect of co-infection on CD4 count and liver function.

Study design

This was a hospital based descriptive cross sectional study of one hundred consecutive therapy-naive HIV-infected individuals. The CD4 count, Hepatitis B surface antigen, Serum albumin, total Protein, and liver enzymes were determined using standard techniques.

Results

The prevalence of HIV and HBV co-infection was 37%. The mean serum ALT and ALP were significantly higher in the co- infected patients (P-values <0.05). The mean CD4 count of the mono infected patients was significantly higher (p-value of 0.014). The mean serum ALT, AST and ALP of mono and co-infected patients with CD4 count<200/µl were significantly higher than those with count ≥ 200 cells/µl. (p-value of <0.01). The mean ALT and AST of the co-infected patients and all patients with CD4 count <200 cells/µl were higher than the normal reference range.

Conclusion

Approximately one third of HIV positive patients had hepatitis B virus co-infection. Co-infection and CD4 count <200 cells/µl are likely to result in abnormal ALT and AST. We recommend that co-infected patients and those with CD4 count <200 cells/µl should be given non-hepatotoxic antiretroviral drug.

Keywords: HIV, Hepatitis B, CD4 count, liver function, co-infection

Introduction

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV) share similar routes of transmission, making it possible for an individual to have a co-infection. The common routes of transmission vary from place to place depending on the degree of endemicity of HBV. In areas of low endemicity, such as North America, Australia and Europe, HBV and HIV infection are usually acquired in adulthood through sexual or percutaneous transmission. In countries with intermediate and high HBV endemicity like Nigeria, the main routes of transmission of HBV and HIV are vertical in children and through sexual intercourse in adults. The prevalence of chronic coinfection among HIV-infected individuals is around 5–7% and 10–20% respectively in countries with low and those with intermediate/high HBV endemicity respectively.14

Hepatitis B virus infection is a major cause of chronic liver diseases including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. The progression of hepatic complications from HBV infection is accelerated in patients co-infected with HIV.5, 6 This is particularly so in HIV infected men with very low CD4 count. 7In addition, HIV infected individuals are more likely to lose previously developed protective anti-HBs antibody and develop acute hepatitis B infection; this risk is also associated with lower CD4 counts.8 The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in HIV infected patients who are co-infected with hepatitis B virus is also increased in individuals with lower CD4 counts.9

Hepatic toxicity is a common complication in HIV-infected patients on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART).10

Patients who had viral hepatitis in addition to HIV were found to be about 4 times more likely to develop severe hepatic toxicity associated with antiretroviral drug.

This has been attributed to HAART induced immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS).11,12 Because of the HAART induced IRIS which usually leads to worsening of liver disease including hepatic de-compensation, the actual effect of HBV and HIV co-infection on liver function is best studied in HAART naive patients. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of HBV infection among HIV-infected HAART naive patients and investigate the effect of co-infection on CD4 count and liver function of the patients.

Methods

Patients included in this study were the first 100 consecutive therapy-naive HIV- infected individuals attending the HAART clinic at University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin between January and December 2010. University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital Ethical Review Committee which is a member of the National Health Research Ethics Council approved the study protocol. Written Informed consent of the participants was equally obtained. Patients that did not consent to participate in the study were excluded. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. There is no other conflict of interest whatsoever.

HIV positivity was diagnosed by positive reactions to two different enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Hepatitis B surface antigen test was done using ELISA method. All the ELISA assays were done using kits manufactured by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Berkeley, California. The CD4 cell count was determined using Dynal T4 Quant (Dynal Biotech ASA, Oslo, Norway). Laboratory assessment of liver functions was determined by liver Enzymes - mainly Alanine amino transferase (ALT), Aspartate amino transferase (AST), Alkaline phosphtase (ALP) and albumin as a synthetic function.

Serum Albumin and Total protein were determined with Randox kit (Randox Laboratory limited, Ardmore, UK) using the Bromo Cresol Green (BCG)13 and Biuret14 methods respectively. Normal ranges were 35–50g/l and 60–80g/l respectively. ALT, AST and ALP were determined with Agappe Kit (Agappe Diagnostics, Switzerland GmbH) Normal ranges were 0–15IU/L, 0–23IU/L and 21–91IU/L respectively.

Data was analysed using SPSS version 15. Statistical analysis of mean and standard deviation were used for the numeric variables. Mean of the CD4 count and the various parameters of liver function test of the Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and negative patients were compared by the student t-test. Differences were regarded as significant when p≤ 0.05.

Results

One hundred HIV patients (35 males and 65 females) aged 37±9 years (mean± SD) were recruited for this study. Thirty seven (37%) were hepatitis B positive while 63(63%) were negative. Twenty four (64.9%) of the HBsAg patients were females while 13(35.1%) were males. Majority i.e. 52% of the patients presented at stage 3 and only 20% presented at stage 1 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Stage of disease at diagnosis and HBsAg status

Clinical stage of
disease at diagnosis
HBsAg status
n(%)
Total
n(%)
neg pos
1 15(15) 5(5) 20(20)
2 8(8) 7(7) 15(15)
3 32(32) 20(20) 52(52)
4 8(8) 5(5) 13(13)
Total 63(63) 37(37) 100(100)

The mean CD4 count of all the patients was 212(188) per µl. The mean serum levels for ALT, AST, ALP, total protein and albumin for the study population were 17 (23) IU/L, 25(24) IU/L, 56(64) IU/L, 75±9g/l and 38(7)g/l respectively.

The mean levels of liver enzymes, serum albumin and total proteins of the HIV mono infected patients were all within the normal reference ranges. In the co-infected patients, ALT and AST were higher than normal but the other parameters were within the normal reference ranges.

The mean serum level of ALT and ALP were significantly higher in the co infected patients than in the HIV mono infected patients, P-values of 0.043 and 0.042 respectively. The higher level of AST among co infected patients compared to the HIV mono infected patients was not statistically significant (p-value of 0.11).There was no significant difference in the levels of total protein and albumin between the co infected and mono infected patients (Table 2).

Table 2.

Biochemical parameter and CD4 count in HBsAg positive and negative patients

Parameter HBsAg
negative
(m±sd)
HBsAg
positive
(m±sd)
Mean
difference
p-value
ALT(UI/L) 13.86 ±19.8 23.32 ± 26.1 9.4672 0.043
AST(UI/L) 21.95± 23.5 29.84 ±25.1 7.8855 0.118
ALP(UI/L) 45.76± 55.2 72.95 ±75.3 27.1878 0.042
Total protein
(g/l)
75.68± 11.6 74.50 ±9.7 1.1825 0.606
Albumin(g/l) 37.62± 6.5 37.75 ±7.2 0.1310 0.927
CD4 count
(cells/µl)
247.19± 209.7 152.1 ±123.9 −95.0553 0.014

Normal reference values: Serum albumin (35–50g/l), Total protein (60–80g/l), ALT (0–15IU/L), AST(0–23IU/L) and ALP(21–91IU/L)

The mean CD4 count of the mono infected patients was significantly higher than that of the co-infected patients (p-value of 0.014). The mean levels of all the liver enzymes, serum albumin and total proteins of the all HIV infected patients with CD4 count ≥ 200/µl were all within the normal reference ranges for the laboratory. For those with CD4 count below 200/µl the mean ALT and AST were higher than normal but the other parameters were within the normal reference ranges. The mean serum level of ALT, AST and ALP of patients with CD4 count below 200/µl were significantly higher than the mean of those with CD4 count ≥ 200/µl (p-value of <0.01 in each case) Table 3.

Table 3.

Biochemical parameters in patients with CD4 count above and below 200 cells/µl.

CD4
count
(cells/µl)
N Mean Std.
Deviation
Mean
difference
p-value
ALT (UI/L) >= 200 37 13.000 11.5326 −6.9206
< 200 63 19.921 26.9577 0.000
AST
(UI/L)
>= 200 37 17.946 16.4805 −10.9906
< 200 63 28.937 27.2041 0.002
ALP
(UI/L)
>= 200 36 43.944 45.2364 −18.8175
< 200 63 62.762 71.4983 0.008
Total protein >= 200 36 72.722 10.0644 −3.9762
(g/l) < 200 63 76.698 11.1668 0.637
Albumin
(g/l)
>= 200 36 37.750 6.3308 −0.1310 0.839
< 200 63 37.619 7.0400

Normal reference values: Serum albumin (35–50g/l), Total protein (60–80g/l), ALT (0–15IU/L), AST(0–23IU/L) and ALP(21–91IU/L)

The mean level of AST of the male co-infected patients was significantly higher than their female counterparts (p-value of 0.007) but there was no significant difference in their ALT, ALP, serum albumin and total protein level. (Table 4)

Table 4.

Sex comparison of biochemical parameters among co-infected and mono-infected patients.

Parameters Co-infected patients Mono-infected patients
male Female p-value Male female p-value
ALT 19.5±19.7 25.4±29.2 0.463 18.0±29.1 11.6±12.1 0.047
AST 37.6±33.1 25.6±19.1 0.007 21.7±27.4 22.1±21.6 0.921
ALP 67.8±82.9 75.8±72.6 0.758 46.5±69.7 45.3±46.4 0.636
Albumin 35.2±8.2 39.2±6.4 0.404 37.9±7.7 37.5±5.9 0.363
Total
protein
72.2±8.9 75.8±10.0 0.775 78.0±10.7 74.4±12.0 0.290

Among the HIV mono-infected patients significant difference was found only in the ALT level in which case the mean value in males was significantly higher than in female ( p-value of 0.047)

Discussion

Hepatitis B virus is a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Hepatic toxicity is also a well known complication of treatment of HIV infection with HAART. Accurate assessment of HBV infection in HIV co-infected individuals is necessary in order to make therapeutic decisions.6 World Health Organization (WHO) advocates HBsAg testing especially in areas of high HBV prevalence, but additional testing for HBV markers such as HBeAg and HBV DNA and tests to assess stage of liver disease (e.g. liver enzymes, liver biopsy, etc) may not be widely available in many resource limited countries.15

In most of the centres where HIV/AIDS patients are being managed in Nigeria the HBsAg and assay of liver enzymes are done routinely before commencement of HAART. This is to help the physician to decide on the appropriate regimen in terms of avoiding those that are hepatotoxic in patients who already have derangement of the liver function and also the use of drugs that are also effective against HBV for HBsAg positive patients.

The prevalence of HBV infection among HIV infected HAART naive patients in this study was 37%. This is higher than the prevalence in other countries with high HBV endemicity.14 This study has shown that the level of serum ALT and ALP is higher in HIV and HBV coinfected patients compared to HIV mono-infected patients. This is consistent with a previous study done in Nigeria and South Tamil Nadu.16, 17

This study has also shown that CD4 count of the HIV mono-infected patients was significantly higher than that of the patients co-infected with HBV.

Furthermore, mean serum level of ALT, AST and ALP of patients with CD4 count below 200/µl were significantly higher than in those with CD4 count ≥ 200/µl. In a prospective longitudinal cohort study with subjects recruited from US, Australia and Thailand, it was found that the prevalence of hepatotoxicity at baseline was about 13% and that CD4 count < 200 cells/mm3 and HBV DNA > 2000 IU/ml were significantly associated with an increased risk of significant hepatotoxicity among HIV/HBV co-infected people on long-term HAART.18

The serum levels of ALT and AST among mono- and co-infected patients respectively were significantly higher among male patients than in female patients. This difference was much more significant among the co-infected patients and therefore confirms previous studies that suggested that HIV infection accelerated the progression to hepatic complications in HBV infected men.5,6

Routine estimation of Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) is an inexpensive and non-invasive means of assessing liver disease as it reflects the activity of hepatotropic viruses and status of liver during therapy with various hepatotoxic drugs. Even though it is well known that ALT may even be normal in the presence of advanced liver disease, in resource limited countries like Nigeria it still remains the affordable test in the assessment of liver function in the management of HIV/AIDS patients.

Elevated ALT at baseline is an indication that the liver is already compromised and so drugs that are hepatotoxic will have to be avoided in order not to further compromise the liver function. Those with coinfection with HBV are usually given drugs that are also effective for treatment of HBV.

Baseline CD4 count which used to be a standard requirement for commencement of antiretroviral therapy may also be used as a surrogate test for liver function especially in co-infected patients. So that even if the ALT is normal a low CD4 count below 200 may be an signal for performing more sensitive or invasive test to assess the function of the liver.

In conclusion, the prevalence of HBV infection among HIV infected HAART naive patients in this study was higher than in previous studies. Hepatitis B virus coinfected HIV positive patients are more likely to have abnormal liver function test than the mono-infected patients. HIV infected patients with CD4 below 200/µl are also more likely to have abnormal liver function than those with CD4 count above 200cells/µl. We recommend that hepatitis B virus co-infected HIV positive patients should be given first-line antiretroviral drugs that are non- hepatotoxic. Patients with CD4 count below 200cells/µl should also be given non hepatotoxic antiviral drugs regardless of their HBsAg status.

References

  • 1.Alter MJ. Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and HIV co infection. J Hepatol. 2006;44(1 Suppl):S6–S9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee HC, Ko NY, Lee NY, et al. Seroprevalence of viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted disease among adults with recently diagnosed HIV infection in Southern Taiwan, 2000-5: upsurge in hepatitis C virus infections among injection drug users. J Formos Med Assoc. 2008;107:404–411. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60106-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Diop-Ndiaye H, Toure-Kane C. Hepatitis B, C seroprevalence and delta virus in HIV-1 Senegalese patients at HAART initiation (retrospective study) J Med Virol. 2008;80:1332–1336. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nyirenda M, Beadsworth MB, Stephany P, et al. Prevalence of infection with hepatitis B and C virus and co infection with HIV in medical inpatients in Malawi. J Infect. 2008;57:72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2008.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Puoti M, Torti C, Bruno R, et al. Natural history of chronic hepatitis B in co-infected patients. J Hepatol. 2006;44:65–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thio C. Hepatitis B and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Co infection. Hepatol. 2009;49:138–145. doi: 10.1002/hep.22883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bodsworth NJ, Cooper DA, Donovan B. The influence of human immunodeficiency virus virus type 1 infection on the development of the hepatitis B carrier state. J Infect Dis. 1991;163:1138–1140. doi: 10.1093/infdis/163.5.1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Biggar RJ, Goedert JJ, Hoofnagle J. Accelerated loss of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen among immunodeficient homosexual men infected with HIV. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:360. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198703053161015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clifford GM, Rickenbach M, Polesel J, et al. Influence of HIV-related immunodeficiency on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. AIDS. 2008;22:2135–2141. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32831103ad. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Akande AA, Olaosebikan OF, Jimoh AK, Abdulazeez Olawumi HO. Lamivudine therapy and hepatotoxicity as seen in a Nigerian tertiary antiretroviral treatment centre. Afr J of Biochem Res. 2007;1(6):90–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hoffman CJ, Thio CL. Clinical implications of HIV and hepatitis B co infection in Asia and Africa. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:402–409. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70135-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Drake A, Mijch A, Sasadeusz J. Immune reconstitution hepatitis in HIV and hepatitis B co infection, despite lamivudine as part of HAART. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:129–132. doi: 10.1086/421386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tietz NW. Clinical Guide to Laboratory Tests. 3rd Edition. Philadephia. PA: WB Saunders Company; pp. 518–519. (1195) [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Parvin R, Pande SV, Venkitasubramanian TA. On the colorimetric Biuret method of protein determi nation. Analyt Biochem. 1965;12(2):219–229. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(65)90085-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.WHO, author. Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents: recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva, Switzerland: 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Otegbayo JA, Taiwo BO, Akingbola TS, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis B and C seropositivity in a Nigerian cohort of HIV-infected patients. Ann Hepatol. 2008;7(2):152–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ganesh KA, Sridharan K, Thirunalasundari T. Seroprevalence of HCV and its co-infection with HBV and HIV among liver disease patients of South Tamil Nadu. World J Hepatol. 2010;2(1):42–48. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v2.i1.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Audsley J, Seaberg E, Sasadeusz J. Factors Associated with Hepatotoxicity in an International HIV/HBV Co-infected Cohort on Long-term HAART; 17th Conference on Retroviruses & Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2010); February 16–19, 2010; San Francisco. (Abstract 691) [Google Scholar]

Articles from Ghana Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Ghana Medical Association

RESOURCES