Table 3.
Study outcomes
| Theme | Sub-theme | Study outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| PU | Collaboration & decision making | • Clear and understandable 3D home representations |
| • Valuable tool for joint decision making and collaboration | ||
| • Empower patients to have influence on decisions | ||
| • Increase awareness and understanding of the design options | ||
| Educational value | • Function of specialist OT equipment not intuitive | |
| • Potential of learning equipment function from using CIDA | ||
| PEOU | Interface considerations | • Increase size of icons |
| • Provide textual descriptors | ||
| • Revise folder structure/location of OT equipment | ||
| Size & scale | • Accuracy of measurements | |
| Dexterity & motor skills | • Redesign interface/functions to require less dexterity/motor skills | |
| AU | Assisted use | • More suitable to be used alongside an expert user/practitioner |
| Existing applications | • Confidence in value and applicability | |
| • Familiarity with CIDA in existing real-world contexts |