Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 26;10(8):e0134701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134701

Table 4. Model 2 (with minimum temperature) regression parameters.

Models were adjusted for previous weeks’ influenza activity.

Meteorological Smooth Terms EDF (p-value)* Adj. % Dev. Pred. Corr.
Min. Temp Precipitation Solar Radiation R2 Explained Coeff. ǂ
Berlin 1.6 (0.006) 1 (0.01) 0.71 75.3 0.87
Ljubljana 1.95 (<0.001) 1.7 (0.008) 2 (<0.001) 0.30 61.8 0.10
Castile & León 1.84 (<0.001) 1.87 (0.007) 1.61 (<0.001) 0.56 72.0 0.84
North 1 (<0.001) 1.94 (<0.001) 0.58 74.5 0.55
Haifa 1.91 (0.003) 3.91 (<0.001) 2.98 (0.1) 0.54 65.8 0.02
Center 1 (<0.001) 1 (<0.001) 0.70 82.7 0.90
Tel Aviv 1.75 (<0.001) 0.66 74.4 0.80
Jerusalem 2.82 (0.2) 3.92 (0.007) 1 (<0.001) 0.72 85.4 0.90
South 1.55 (<0.001) 2.32 (0.01) 0.71 72.4 0.89

* EDF is the effective degree of freedom for the estimated smooth terms. Meteorological parameter units: °C for minimum temperature, mm/day for precipitation, W/m2 for solar radiation.

ǂ Correlation coefficient between the estimated influenza-associated ILI or ARI with the observed during 2010/2011 season.