Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 26;10(8):e0136094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136094

Table 5. Secondary outcome.

Publication Method Intervention Results Conclusion
Perdonà et al. [15] Di Lorenzo et al. [16] Validated questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-c30) Arm A: prophylactic RT. Arm B: tamoxifen. Arm C: control No differences in mean global health scores were found when comparing the two intervention groups. QoL was not negatively affected by either treatment option.
Boccardo et al. [7] Self-adminstered, validated questionnaire. Arm A: tamoxifen or anastrozole. Arm B: control No differences between groups concerning sexual interest. Minor difference related to sexual functioning, scores increased at 6-months for the anastrozole and control groups while the tamoxifen group remained unchanged. Data on other domains were not reported in detail. No harmful effects on QoL were caused by the addition of tamoxifen or anastrozole to bicalutamide. Tamoxifen did not worsen sexual interest or functioning.
Fradet et al [10] Patients were interviewed Arm A: tamoxifen daily (1–20 mg). Arm B: placebo Arm A: erectile dysfunction was lowest in the 20 mg group (2.9%) and highest in the 10 mg group (11.8%). Arm B: erectile dysfunction in 3.3%. No major differences in erectile dysfunction between placebo and the different tamoxifen doses.
Saltzstein et al. [4] Self-adminstered questionnaire Arm A: tamoxifen or anastrozole daily.Arm B: placebo Fewer than 5% in all treatment groups reported loss of libido or erectile difficulties. No evidence of increased sexual dysfunction with either treatment.