Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2015 Apr 29;149(3):577–585.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.045

Table 1.

Simulation results of the population-based design and prospective design for the realistic scenario. The table shows the average annual progression rate and the cumulative cancer incidence rates for both i) EAC diagnosis and ii) HGD and EAC diagnosis for follow up lengths of 5,10,15 and 20 years. In addition, the average number of person-years is shown for each scenario. BE: Barrett’s esophagus; EAC: Esophageal adenocarcinoma

Annual progression rate

EAC HGD and EAC

Follow up length Population-based Prospective Difference Population-based Prospective Difference
5 year follow up 0.19% 0.36% 92% 0.27% 0.56% 110%
10 year follow up 0.43% 0.53% 22% 0.48% 0.64% 34%
15 year follow up 0.57% 0.62% 9% 0.61% 0.72% 18%
20 year follow up 0.63% 0.65% 5% 0.66% 0.74% 13%

Cumulative progression rate

EAC HGD and EAC

Population-based Prospective Population-based Prospective Difference
5 year follow up 0.9% 1.8% 91% 1.3% 2.8% 108%
10 year follow up 4.0% 4.8% 21% 4.4% 5.8% 33%
15 year follow up 7.0% 7.6% 8% 7.5% 8.7% 17%
20 year follow up 9.1% 9.5% 4% 9.6% 10.6% 11%

Average number of person-years per BE patient

EAC HGD and EAC

Population-based Prospective Population-based Prospective
5 year follow up 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.9
10 year follow up 9.2 9.1 9.0 8.6
15 year follow up 12.4 12.3 12.0 11.3
20 year follow up 14.6 14.5 14.0 13.0