Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Liver Transpl. 2015 Jul 21;21(9):1123–1132. doi: 10.1002/lt.24163

Table 2.

Comparison of cognitive testing between patients with and without HE within each group. Patients with HE performed worse than those without HE in both Alc and Nalc groups.

Alcoholic cirrhosis Non-alcoholic cirrhosis
No-HE (n=19) HE (n=27) No-HE (n=48) HE (n=44)
Number connection-A (sec) 41 ± 4.4 48.9 ± 4.3 37 ± 2.1 48.0 ± 3.5**
Number connection-B (sec) 103.8 ± 12.8 153.9 ± 22.8 89.7 ± 5.2 156.23 ± 17.4**
Inhibitory Control Lures (number) 12.9 ± 2.5 14.3 ± 1.7 11.1 ± 1.3 12.6 ± 1.2
Digit Symbol (score) 53.7 ± 4.5** 40.4 ± 2.7 56.6 ± 2.1** 47.5 ± 2.8
Block design (score) 24.5 ± 3.3 19.2 ± 2.2 27.5 ±1.9 24.4 ± 2.0
Line tracing time (sec) 120.5 ± 15.6 120.7 ± 10.6 112.5 ± 8.0 124.9 ± 10.4
Line tracing errors (number) 33.1 ± 7.1 47.8 ± 6.5 28.7 ± 4.3 36.3 ± 5.0
Serial Dotting (sec) 71.5 ± 5.3 100.1 ± 9.7* 65.8 ± 4.3 77.4 ± 4.7*
Inhibitory Control Targets (%) 95.5 ± 2.2* 85.8 ± 3.0 97.1 ± 0.6** 92.6 ± 1.1
*

p<0.05

**

p<0.005 no-HE vs. HE (within each group); data is presented as Mean±SEM; a high score on block design, digit symbol and inhibitory control targets and a low score on the rest indicate poor cognition.

HE: prior overt hepatic encephalopathy, No-HE: no history of overt hepatic encephalopathy

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure