Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2015 May 7;46(1):167–178. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150047

Table 2.

Characteristics of study subjects in 1998/99 as a function of outcome

Normal MCI AD Effect size1
n 83 55 151
Age 78.7 (3.9) 78.7 (3.4) 79.7 (3.5) 0.02
Education2 68.7 (57) 67.2 (39) 59.6 (90) 0.09
Sex2 44.6 (37) 63.8 (37) 68.2 (103) 0.21*
Race2 85.5 (71) 79.3 (46) 83.4 (126) 0.06
APOE ε42 23.1 (18) 21.8 (12) 27.0 (38) 0.05
Estimated IQ 119.9 (8.3) 120.3 (7.9) 117.3 (9.0) 0.03
3MSE3 96.6 (3.8) 97.0 (3.6) 95.8 (4.2) 0.02
DSST4 48.9 (11.5) 50.6 (13.3) 44.6 (12.0) 0.04*
CES-D5 4.09 (3.6) 4.01 (3.8) 5.00 (4.2) 0.01
Hypertension2 45.8 (38) 44.8 (26) 49.0 (74) 0.04
Diabetes2 9.6 (8) 12.1 (7) 16.6 (25) 0.09
White matter hyperintensities2 32.5 (27) 32.8 (19) 37.1 (56) 0.05
MRI-identified infarcts2 25.3 (21) 22.4 (13) 27.8 (42) 0.05
Whole brain grey matter6 37.2 (1.1) 37.4 (1.3) 37.3 (1.2) 0.01
1)

Cohen’s f for continuous data, Cramer’s V for categorical data.

2)

Percent (n) Present, Yes, Female, Caucasian, Greater than High School.

3)

Modified Mini Mental Status Examination [10].

4)

Digit symbol substitution test [39].

5)

Center for Epidemiological Studies–Depression scale [76].

6)

As a percentage of total intracranial volume.

*

p<0.05.