Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 1;4:e07404. doi: 10.7554/eLife.07404

Figure 5. Measurements from acoustic tomographies.

Figure 5.

(A) Wing orientation predicted mean depth with the UP position (triangles, solid lines) having a larger depth profile on all substrates than FLAT position (crosses, dashed lines). The biggest effect was of resting substrate with the smooth surface, slate, causing the largest depth profile for each moth. (B) There was a significant interaction between the orientation of the wings and the substrate on the measures of shadow strength (missing background). The largest effect of shadow strength was observed on smooth surfaces (leaf and slate). More negative values indicate more obvious missing substrate with zero being no change from substrate alone. See also Figure 5—source data 1.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07404.008

Figure 5—source data 1. Shadow and depth measurements.
elife07404s002.xlsx (53.2KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.07404.009