Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 27;5:13319. doi: 10.1038/srep13319

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analysis of OS in HCC patients.

Variable Number Univariateanalysis Multivariatenalysis
P value HR (95% CI) P value
Histology:
 Tumor HNF-1B expression
  Low vs High 134 vs 49 0.001* 1.637(1.093,2.450) 0.017*
 Tumor K19 expression
  Low vs High 89 vs 94 0.013*   NS
 Tumor K7 expression
  Low vs High 84 vs 99 <0.001* 1.799(1.220,2.654) 0.003*
 Tumor EpCAM expression
  Low vs High 95 vs 88 0.321   NA
 Tumor OV6 expression
  Low vs High 88 vs 95 0.509   NA
 Non-tumor HNF-1B expression
  Low vs High 134 vs 49 0.026*   NS
Clinical characteristics
 Age(yr)
  <50 vs ≥50 96 vs 87 0.129   NA
 Gender
  Male vs Female 162 vs 21 0.924   NA
 Tumor size
  <5 cm vs ≥5 cm 89 vs 94 0.012* 1.461(1.012,2.108) 0.043*
 Tumor number
  Single vs Multiple 159 vs 24 0.071 1.708(1.004,2.904) 0.048*
 Cirrhosis
  No vs Yes 125 vs 58 0.308   NA
 TNM stage
  I/II vs III 166 vs 17 0.015*   NS
 HbsAg
  Negative vs Positive 11 vs 172 0.606   NA
 Serum AFP
 <400 vs ≥400 116 vs 67 0.428   NA
 Histological grade
  Well/moderate vs poorly 133 vs 50 0.592   NA
 Lymphovascular invasion
  Negative vs Positive 66 vs 117 0.008* 1.633(1.101,2.423) 0.015*

NA, not adopted; NS, not significant; HR, hazard ratio; Factors with p < 0.1 in univariate analysis were adopted for further multivariate analysis. *P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.