Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 18;115(2):227–236. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu236

Table 1.

Growth characteristics of the investigated Utricularia populations

Water body Dry weight (mg) Total length (cm) No. of buds Leaf density (dm−1) Trap density (dm−1) Traps per leaf N content (%) C/N ratio (Utricularia) C/N ratio (control plant)
Seetaler Lake (U. vulgaris) 216 ± 89 50·2 ± 15·0 2·9 ± 1·5 11·7 ± 1·9 439·0 ± 99·3 37·9 ± 7·7 2·4 ± 0·5 17·9 ± 3·8 19·9
Seetaler Lake (U. minor) 21 ± 20 40,7 ± 15·9 2·8 ± 1·7 11·5 ± 1·6 138·6 ± 51·3 12·8 ± 6·2 2·4 ± 0·2 16·3 ± 1·2
Seetaler Lagg (U. minor) 10 ± 5 35·9 ± 12·7 6·1 ± 3·0 22·0 ± 3·4 52·8 ± 21·3 2·5 ± 1·0 2·1 ± 0·4 19·6 ± 5·3 18·2
Peat Bog Schrems (U. australis) 72 ± 43 72 ± 42 8·3 ± 6·1 19·9 ± 3·4 163·6 ± 80·2 8·9 ± 5·5 2·7 ± 0·8 16·4 ± 3·8 14·3
Winkelauer Pond (U. australis) 2 ± 2 8·2 ± 3·2 1·3 ± 0·7 28·3 ± 7·7 63·3 ± 24·4 2·4 ± 1·1 5·2 ± 0·7 8·2 ± 0·9 24·8
Peat Bog Hochstand (U. australis) 59 ± 60 42·5 ± 23·7 3·2 ± 1·3 15·4 ± 2·7 367·6 ± 180·0 25·6 ± 15·6 2·0 ± 0·3 20·5 ± 2·9 25·3
Peat Bog Brand (U. australis) 38 ± 25 46·6 ± 28·4 4·0 ± 1·7 12·6 ± 2·5 202·6 ± 54·4 17·1 ± 4·4 4·2 ± 0·4 9·4 ± 0·7 21·0
Postteich (U. australis) 35 ± 25 49·4 ± 24·7 5·7 ± 3·7 23·0 ± 3·7 156·4 ± 51·1 7·2 ± 3·1 1·1 ± 0·1 32·6 ± 3·4 35·3

n = 8–12; data are shown as arithmetic mean ± s.d.