Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 19;81(14):4736–4743. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00570-15

TABLE 4.

Phytobeneficial effects of bacterial isolates on maize seedling growtha

Treatment Height (cm) Stem girth (cm) No. of leaves Leaf area (cm2) Shoot mass (g dry matter) Nutrient content (ppm)
N P K
Control 23.7 (0.4) a 0.4 (0.3) b 7.0 (0.0) b 225.2 (24.7) c 1.8 (0.0) d 1.4 (0.1) d 0.8 (0.0) b 2.3 (0.3) d
Isolate
    EBS8 29.0 (2.2) a 1.4 (0.1) a 8.0 (0.0) a 242.0 (1.1) bc 7.1 (0.6) a 3.9 (0.0) a 1.1 (0.0) a 4.5 (0.5) b
    EPR2 28.7 (2.1) a 1.5 (0.0) a 8.0 (0.3) a 284.7 (4.6) b 4.7 (0.1) b 1.8 (0.1) c 0.6 (0.1) c 6.4 (0.2) a
    IGBR11 24.6 (0.1) a 1.1 (0.0) a 8.0 (0.3) a 337.4 (0.7) a 3.5 (0.1) c 1.8 (0.1) c 0.4 (0.1) d 1.7 (0.1) d
    ADS14 27.8 (3.0) a 1.8 (0.3) a 8.0 (0.0) a 276.5 (14.5) b 4.0 (0.1) c 3.5 (0.1) b 0.4 (0.0) d 3.6 (0.3) c
a

Results are means (standard deviations) for five replicates. Values followed by different letters within a column indicate significant differences according to the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple-range test (α = 0.05).