Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 28.
Published in final edited form as: Infect Genet Evol. 2014 Apr 29;27:566–575. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.04.014

Table 1.

Comparison between Connecticut sites and Block Island sites of the density of Ixodes scapularis nymphs (DON), density of nymphs (DIN) and nymphal infection prevalence (NIP) using poisson and logistic models.

Estimate Std error z value P
Poisson - DONa
Intercept -3.46 0.08 -43.94 < 0.001
Region 0.733 0.1 7.16 < 0.001
Year -0.12 0.12 -1.01 0.31
Region * Year 0.28 0.15 1.92 0.06
offset = log(transect area)d
Poisson - DINb
Intercept -4.81 0.13 -37.65 < 0.001
Region 0.85 0.14 6.22 < 0.001
Year 0.09 0.13 0.71 0.48
offset = log(transect area)d
Logistic - NIPc
Intercept -1.24 0.19 -6.58 < 0.001
Region 0.04 0.22 0.17 0.87
Year 0.67 0.27 2.52 0.01
Region * Year -0.7 0.32 -2.23 0.03
a

Density of nymphs,

b

Density of infected nymphs,

c

Nymphal infection prevalence,

d

In the Poisson models transect area is an offset or exposure variable to adjust for sampling effort