Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 28.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun 18;17(12):3252–3258. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1160-7

TABLE 1.

Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) patients versus non-NAC patients

Variable Adjuvant/no chemotherapy (N = 124) NAC (N = 81) P value
Age (years) 54.3 50.6 0.02
BMI (kg/m2) 29.7 28.8 0.36
Race 0.78
    White 78% (97) 73% (59)
    Black 10% (12) 11% (9)
    Hispanic 10% (13) 15% (12)
    Other 2% (3) 1% (1)
Tumor size (T)a <0.01
    T1 57% (71) 10% (8)
    T2 38% (47) 35% (28)
    T3 3% (4) 19% (15)
    T4 2% (2) 37% (30)
Stage (AJCC) <0.01
    Stage 1 44% (54) 1% (1)
    Stage 2 44% (55) 37% (30)
    Stage 3 12% (15) 62% (50)
Premenopausal 28% (35) 39% (31) 0.10
LN statusb 41% (51) 60% (48) 0.008
ER 79% (98) 57% (46) 0.001
PR 65% (80) 42% (34) 0.001
HER2 gene amplification 6% (8) 33% (27) <0.001
Intrinsic subtypesc
    TNBC subtype 18% (22) 22% (18) 0.43
    Luminal A subtype 76% (94) 46% (37) <0.001
    Luminal B subtype 5% (6) 14% (11) 0.03
    HER2 subtype 2% (2) 19% (15) <0.001
LVI 28% (34) 30% (20) 0.77
High tumor grade 35% (43) 66% (53) <0.001
pCR NA 30% (24) NA
DTCs 32% (39) 25% (20) 0.29

AJCC AJCC Cancer Staging Manual,16 LVI presence of lymphovascular invasion, NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, DTCs disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow, pCR pathologic complete response,10 BMI body mass index

a

Tumor size: T1, ≤2 cm; T2, >2 cm and ≤5 cm; T3, >5 cm; T4, any tumor size extending to overlying skin or chest wall

b

LN status: presence of axillary lymph node metastases

c

TNBC: triple negative breast cancer (ER–, PR–, HER2–); luminal A subtype (ER+, and/or PR+, HER2–); luminal B subtype (ER+, and/or PR+, HER2+); HER2 subtype (ER–, PR–, HER2+)