Table 3. Results of discriminat analysis using the average of the readings and all wavelengths of the spectrum FT-NIR.
Adult Model | Young Model | Combined Model | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dataset | Dataset | Dataset | |||||||||
Species | MeanAd+Ab | MeanAd | MeanAb | Single Spectrum | MeanAd+Ab | MeanAd | MeanAb | Single Spectrum | MeanAd+Ab | MeanAd | MeanAb |
Protium apiculatum Swart | 66 | 50 | 59 | 54 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 96 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Protium decandrum (Aubl.) Marchand | 71 | 87 | 71 | 86 | 0 | 8 | 31 | 65 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Protium grandifolium Engl. | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 70 | 50 | 70 | 20 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Protium hebetatum D.C. Daly forma A | 25 | 15 | 30 | 12 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 91 | 91 |
Protium hebetatum D.C. Daly forma B | 47 | 57 | 21 | 53 | 12 | 0 | 19 | 12 | 98 | 98 | 90 |
Protium krukoffi Swart | 22 | 55 | 94 | 47 | 85 | 77 | 73 | 76 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Protium occultum Daly | 100 | 100 | 90 | 98 | 100 | 95 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Protium pallidum Cuatrec. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Protium paniculatum (Engl.) var. nova | 66 | 100 | 58 | 27 | 69 | 92 | 69 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Protium paniculatum var. riedelianum (Engl.) Daly | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 92 | 100 | 100 | 73 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Protium sagotianum Marchand | 36 | 36 | 45 | 64 | 100 | 87 | 87 | 86 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Protium subserratum (Engl.) Engl. | 11 | 33 | 33 | 11 | 80 | 70 | 80 | 70 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Crepidospermum rhoifolium (Benth.) Triana & Planch | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 41 | 58 | 33 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Percentage of correct identification | 48 | 57 | 56 | 51 | 76 | 75 | 76 | 75 | 98.6 | 98.4 | 98.6 |
Mean Ad +Ab, the average of 12 readings; Mean Ad, the average of the readings of the adaxial surface; Mean Ab, the average of the readings abaxial surface; Single reading, a randomly selected reading. Hit percentage for each species and average percentage for models generated with each data set.