. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 28.

Published in final edited form as: Res Pract Persons Severe Disabl. 2004 Jun;29(2):104–121. doi: 10.2511/rpsd.29.2.104

Table 4.

Sequential Analysis of Alternative Hypothesis about Parent-Child Interaction in Routines

Sequential analysis of steps in coercive sequence using Cycles logic	Statistics	Hypothesized escape-driven routines									Aggregate results
	Statistics	F2A	F3A	F4B	F5A	F5B	F7B	F8A	F9A	F9B	Aggregate results
4-Steps: Given PTR followed by CPR in the first cycle, conditional probability of PWR followed by CPR in the next cycle.	JNTF	74	20	4	11	46	42	5	26	45	287
	CONP	.23	.24	.16	.17	.20	.25	.31	.10	.23	.21
	ADJR	2.21	2.81	1.98:	3.13	3.32	1.15	5.70	.71	.95	8.98
	PVALUE	<.05	<.05	.05+	<.01	<.001	.25+	<.001	.48+	.34+	< .001

Note. PTR = Parent Trigger (Demand); CPR = Child Problem Response; PW = Parent Withdraws Demand; PR = Parent Reduces Demand; CAB = Child Appropriate Behavior. JNTF = Observed Joint/Lagged Frequencies; CONP = Conditional Probability; ADJR = Adjusted Residual; PVALUE = Probability Value. : = Adjusted residuals approximate conditions of normal distribution.