Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 26;3:8. doi: 10.1186/s40170-015-0133-5

Table 1.

Respiratory control of Wt and Vdac1 −/− MEF

Nx Hx
Wt MEF Vdac1 −/− MEF Wt MEF Vdac1 −/− MEF
(a) Basal respiration 20.52 ± 2.5 16.19 ± 1.8 4.5 ± 0.52 10.4 ± 2.41
(b) Oligomycin-insensitve respiration (leak) 5.96 ± 0.9 5.04 ± 0.9 2.4 ± 0.27 7.1 ± 2.73
(c) Oligomycin-sensitive (ATP turnover) respiration 14.56 ± 1.6 11.16 ± 0.8 1.8 ± 0.70 3.2 ± 0.95
(d) Maximal respiration in the presence of FCCP 29.21 ± 3.2 19.29 ± 1.7 5.4 ± 1.19 6.0 ± 0.29
(c/a) Coupling efficiency 0.71 ± 0.02 0.71 ± 0.01 0.4 ± 0.12 0.3 ± 0.13
(d/b) Respiratory control ratio 4.91 ± 0.2 3.95 ± 0.4 2.3 ± 0.71 0.8 ± 0.44
(d-a) Spare respiratory capacity 8.19 ± 1.2 3.10 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.50 −5.4 ± 2.83
graphic file with name 40170_2015_133_Figa_HTML.gif

The oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was measured in real time with a Seahorse XF bioenergetic system for Wt and Vdac1 −/−MEF in Nx or Hx. The average OCR was calculated from at least four measurements during treatment with each compound (oligomycin, FCCP, rotenone/antimycin A) at a 1 μM final concentration.

(a) represents basal respiration, (b) oligomycin-insensitive respiration, (c) oligomycin-sensitive respiration, and (d) maximal respiration in the presence of FCCP. The graph shows how to define a, b, c, and d. The mean ± SEM is representative of six independent experiments carried out in quadruplicate