Table 3.
Multivariate proportional hazards models for incident dominant hand CTS
HR | 95% confidence limits | ||
---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | |||
Time in forceful exertion | |||
(≥20%–<60%) vs <20% | 2.83 | 1.18 | 6.79 |
>60% vs <20% | 19.57 | 5.96 | 64.24 |
BMI≥30 vs <30 kg/m2 | 3.19 | 1.28 | 7.98 |
Model 2 | |||
Threshold limit ratio per unit increase | 1.40 | 1.11 | 1.78 |
BMI≥30 vs <30 kg/m2 | 3.26 | 1.45 | 7.31 |
Job strain* | |||
High vs low/active/passive | 2.13 | 1.00 | 4.54 |
Job strain, psychological demand versus decision latitude as defined by Karasek’s Job Content Questionnaire.
Threshold limit ratio, Force/(7.78–0.78×HAL) based on American Conference for Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Value for HAL and Drinkaus 2005.
Age, gender and other potential covariates did not meet p<0.05 criteria for inclusion in the model.
15 participants had missing values for the job strain variables due to not completing the questionnaire.
BMI, body mass index; CTS, carpal tunnel syndrome; HAL, hand activity level.