Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 28.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Serv. 2007 Aug;4(3):202–224. doi: 10.1037/1541-1559.4.3.202

Table 5.

Design Comparisons: Participant Accuracy and Preference (in Percentages)

Model type
Flat explicit weak-modular (Model 3) Hybrid (Model 2) Strict modular abstract (Model 1)
Choice Identified correct link to the requested information
 First choice 57.3 54.3 36.0
 Second choice 10.0 15.8 0.0
 Third and Fourth choice 5.0 3.2 0.0
 Total correct over all 4 choices 72.3 73.3 36.0
Design Preference
 Participants who preferred design 42 54 4

Two participants had no preference.