Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2015 Feb 14;46:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.02.003

Table 2.

Correlation Coefficients between Modeled W1, W2, and W3 Variables

Variables 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.
1. W1 Women   ---
2. W1 Palestinian −.006   ---
3. W1 Education .022 −.232***   ---
4. W1 Age −.038 −.203*** .055*   ---
5. W1 Religiosity .077** .244*** −.236*** −.118***   ---
6. W1 Immigrant from FSU .002 −.199*** .278*** .108*** −.295***   ---
7. W1 Past Stressful Events .080** .032 .050* .074** −.015 .063*   ---
8. W1 Terrorism Exposure −.105*** −.097*** .035 −.017 .025 .010 .043   ---
9. W2 Depressive Sx. .089** .198*** −.200*** −.049 .057* .004 .112*** .022   ---
10. W2 PTSD Sx. .132*** .165*** −.214*** .041 .086** −.028 .126*** .098*** .589*** ---
11. W3 Alcohol Use Frequency −.152*** −.232*** .093** .028 −.164*** .196*** −.004 .004 −.017 −.095** ---

Notes. Statistics are Spearman’s rank correlations;

*

p <.05;

**

p<.01;

***

p < .001;

FSU = Former Soviet Union; and Sx. = symptoms.