Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 5;29(9):1269–1285. doi: 10.1210/me.2014-1406

Table 1.

Bone Loss Data

WT
Nmp4−/−
Two-Way ANOVA P Values
Sham ovx Sham ovx Genotype Treatment Gene × Treat
%Δ body weight 2.48 ± 7.73 8.65 ± 5.48 4.14 ± 4.70 5.66 ± 2.94 .69 0.03 .17
Uterine weight (g) 0.10 ± 0.05 0.04 ± 0.02 0.10 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.02 .30 <0.0001 .34
Distal femur
BV/TV 0.019 ± 0.004 0.012 ± 0.004 0.038 ± 0.011 0.021 ± 0.010 <.0001 <0.0001 .06
    SMI 3.818 ± 0.250 4.055 ± 0.357 3.387 ± 0.263 3.810 ± 0.294 .0008 0.0011 .32
    Tb.N (mm−1) 2.554 ± 0.239 2.165 ± 0.385 3.128 ± 0.218 2.797 ± 0.276 <.0001 0.0004 .76
    Tb.Th (mm) 0.040 ± 0.005 0.041 ± 0.005 0.039 ± 0.003 0.037 ± 0.004 .08 0.87 .23
    Tb.Sp (mm) 0.393 ± 0.036 0.477 ± 0.097 0.317 ± 0.026 0.359 ± 0.037 <.0001 0.0012 .25
L5 vertebra
    BV/TV 0.189 ± 0.028 0.177 ± 0.013 0.253 ± 0.019 0.212 ± 0.019 <.0001 0.0004 .05
    Tb.N (mm−1) 3.797 ± 0.513 3.580 ± 0.285 4.491 ± 0.345 4.022 ± 0.254 <.0001 0.0091 .32
    Tb.Th (mm) 0.050 ± 0.003 049 ± 0.002 0.056 ± 0.002 0.053 ± 0.002 <.0001 0.0032 .02
    Tb.Sp (mm) 0.227 ± 0.023 0.229 ± 0.013 0.202 ± 0.020 0.214 ± 0.012 .0013 0.25 .44
Serum P1NP WT: Nmp4−/−
P Values [G; T; G × T]4 wks P Values [G; T; G × T]12 wks
Preop Postop4 wks Postop12 wks
5.62 ± 1.21: 6.02 ± 1.41 5.83 ± 1.41: 4.77 ± 1.22 3.15 ± 0.65: 2.81 ± 0.76 .34; .16; .05 .95; <.0001; .36
Serum CTX WT: Nmp4−/−
P Values [G; T; G × T]4 wks P Values [G; T; G × T]12 wks
Preop Postop4 wks Postop12 wks
13.66 ± 2.43: 13.37 ± 1.88 12.96 ± 3.04: 13.53 ± 2.58 11.47 ± 2.24: 9.36 ± 1.22 .92; .46; .96 .14; .0003; .18

The % change body weight, uterine weight, and μCT of distal femur and L5 vertebra from WT and Nmp4−/− mice after ovx or sham operation 4-week postop. Serum bone formation (P1NP) and bone resorption (CTX) marker levels were compared in mice previous to the operation (preop) and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery (postop). The 12-week postop data were obtained from the vehicle-control treatment groups. Data are average ± SD, number of mice/experimental group = 8–14 (4 mice in WT sham uterine weight). Statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05, and differences were determined using a two-way ANOVA.