Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0136834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136834

Table 4. Characteristics of 6,143 farms inside versus outside the three multivariate persistent clusters.

Farms inside clusters Farms outside clusters
Actual No. (%) Actual No (%) p-value
Total number of farms 551 (9.0) 5,592 (91.0)
Conventional farms 299 (54.3) 3,120 (55.8)
Farms in the SPF register 252 (45.7) 2,472 (44.2) 0.519
Farm type Nucleus farms 29 (5.3) 199 (3.6)
Production farms 522 (94.7) 5,393 (96.4) 0.057
Production type Farrow-to-finisher 113 (20.5) 1,317 (23.6)
Sows and finishers 16 (2.9) 143 (2.6)
Sows and weaners 32 (5.8) 256 (4.6)
Sows 11 (2.0) 174 (3.1)
Weaner-finisher 72 (13.1) 843 (15.1)
Weaners 24 (4.4) 229 (4.1)
Finishers 283 (51.4) 2,630 (47.0) 0.155
Farm size
Presence of sows Small (1–254) 40 (23.3) 473 (25.0)
Medium (255–670) 97 (56.4) 946 (50.1)
Large (> 670) 35 (20.3) 471 (24.9) 0.247
Presence of weaners Small (1–783) 48 (19.9) 674 (25.5)
Medium (784–2300) 143 (59.3) 1,315 (49.7)
Large (> 2300) 50 (20.7) 656 (24.8) 0.016
Presence of finishers Small (1–499) 112 (23.1) 1,230 (24.9)
Medium (500–1600) 226 (46.7) 2,543 (51.6)
Large (> 1600) 146 (30.2) 1,160 (23.5) 0.005

Three covariates (farm type, production type and farm size, in bold) were included one at a time in the multivariate scanning statistics. A chi-square test was performed to test for significant differences in the prevalence of farms inside compared to outside the clusters.