Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Jul 5;69(9):998–1006. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12672

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Forest plot of the all included studies comparing the risk of recurrent CDI in patients in CKD vs. without CKD; square data markers represent risk ratios (RRs); horizontal lines, the 95% CIs with marker size reflecting the statistical weight of the study using random-effects meta-analysis. A diamond data marker represents the overall RR and 95% CI for the outcome of interest. IV, inverse variance; SE, standard error.