| Bruno, 2013[28] |
Transbronchial needle aspiration |
Italy |
ROSE reduced costs by 19,400 euros over 60 cases (about $367 per case) by reducing the frequency of medianoscopy |
| Burgess, 2013[31] |
Ultrasound guided,Head and neck,(thyroid, salivary glands, lymph nodes) |
United Kingdom |
ROSE would save approximately $164 per case if ROSE increased the adequacy rate to 100%. |
| Eedes, 2004[7] |
Thyroid |
USA, academic center |
ROSE increased the diagnostic rate at a cost of 220 minutes per diagnostic sample. ROSE is only likely to be cost-effective in limited situations such as for repeat procedures. |
| Layfield, 2001[9] |
Wide range of procedures: both image and palpation guided. |
USA, academic center. |
Cost of pathologist time to perform ROSE exceeds compensation by about $45 for image guided procedures. Compensation may be adequate only when samples are taken and immediately interpreted by the pathologist. |
| Nasuti, 2002[8] |
5688 cases covering a wide range of anatomic sites |
USA, academic center. |
ROSE saved about $356 per case based on a total cost of $3096 per case. |
| Urquiza, 2007[32] |
Endoscopic ultrasound guided FNA for gastro-intestinal lesions |
Spain |
Cost of sampling was $47 per correct diagnosis with ROSE and $49.5 per correct diagnosis without. ROSE was cost effective |
| Zanocco, 2013[10] |
US guided thyroid |
USA, academic center |
The cost per quality adjusted life year was approximately $639,000 per case. ROSE is not cost effective. |
