Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0135466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135466

Table 4. Comparison of ROSE vs fixed sampling for four case types using the baseline sampling protocol.

(Stopping rules: 3 needle passes for fixed sampling, 1 adequate sample for ROSE). Case types correspond to the procedure type (simple vs complex) and the per-pass probability of an adequate sample (low vs high).

Outcome Symbol Scenario
Complex High Success Complex Low Success Simple High Success Simple Low Success
Expected Total Cost Rose TC R $652 $836 $203 $251
Fixed TC F $599 $874 $170 $248
Difference difference $53 -$37 $33 $3
Needle Passes per Procedure Rose NpassR 1.7 3.4 1.7 3.4
Fixed NpassF 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Difference difference -1.3 0.4 -1.3 0.4
Adequacy Rate Rose A R 0.98 0.94 0.98 0.94
Fixed A F 0.93 0.65 0.93 0.65
Difference difference 0.05 0.29 0.05 0.29
Number of Procedures Per Diagnosis Rose NprocR 1.02 1.06 1.02 1.06
Fixed NprocF 1.07 1.57 1.07 1.57
Difference difference -0.05 -0.51 -0.05 -0.51
Cost Per Procedure Rose TCprocR $641 $787 $199 $237
Fixed TCprocF $558 $558 $158 $158
Difference difference $83 $229 $41 $79
Duration Of Sample Period Rose TsampleR (min) 15.6 30.6 15.6 30.6
Fixed TsampleF (min) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Difference difference 9.6 24.6 9.6 24.6