Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0137078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137078

Table 3. Significant two-way comparisons of bab genotype and other factors in both populations a .

bab genotype comparison P value b for distribution within
KH AH Combined c
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs babA,B,C or empty at Locus B 0.1046 0.0028 0.0131
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs Full or empty bab at Locus C 0.0027 0.4111 0.4500
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs one or two hom loci occupied 0.0167 <0.0001 0.0029
babB ‘IN’ or Other at Locus B vs one or two hom loci occupied 0.0210 1.0000 0.6070
Full or empty bab at Locus C vs one or two hom loci occupied 1.0000 0.0390 0.1750
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs homA or homB 0.6390 <0.0001 <0.0001
babA,B,C or empty at Locus B vs homA or homB 0.7340 0.0160 0.0260
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs vacA s1 or vacA s2 1.0000 <0.0001 <0.0001
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs vacA i1 or vacA i2 0.9999 <0.0001 <0.0001
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs vacA m1 or vacA m2 0.9999 <0.0001 <0.0001
babA,B,C or empty at Locus A vs cagA EPIYA-ABD or Other 0.5010 N/A* <0.0001
babA,B,C or empty at Locus B vs Cancer/Gastric ulcer or Duodenal ulcer/Gastritis 0.0101 0.828 # 0.483 #
babB or other at Locus B vs Cancer or Gastric ulcer or Duodenal ulcer or Gastritis 0.0012 0.806 # 0.447 #

a For simplicity, Table 3 only contains associations for which a statistically significant association was found in at least one grouping; however, an exhaustive analysis was conducted on numerous other permutations of the data.

b Statistically significant P values are in boldface type.

c All isolates (n = 160) analyzed as a single group

*No ABD in the AH

#Also includes a category for Esophogitis/Barrett's Esophagus.