Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2015 Sep;19(9):1619–1629. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1037-7

Table III.

Public and private clinic-specific relationships between psychosocial and cognitive measures and ART adherence

Measure Intercept b(se) Chi-square,p (slope)
Self-efficacy
Private −3.08 .138(.04) 9.61, .002
Public −1.16 .058(.02) 5.60, .018
Motivation for adherence
 Private −0.51 .055(.05) 1.43, .232
Public −1.65 .282(.10) 7.92, .005
Beliefs about medication in general
 Private −0.29 .066(.05) 1.55, .213
 Public −1.19 −.007(.06) 0.01, .906
Specific beliefs about ART
 Private −0.44 .054(.07) 0.59, .443
 Public −1.31 .117(.07) 2.75, .097
Perception of the patient-provider relationship
 Private −0.23 .001(.11) 0.01, .991
 Public −1.03 .030(.10) 0.10, .758
Experiences of the patient-provider relationship
 Private −0.63 .069(.08) 0.73, .394
 Public −1.23 .032(.10) 0.11, .736
Depression (Total)
 Private −0.22 .008(.03) 0.08, .784
 Public −1.14 −.005(.04) 0.02, .884
Depression (Affective)
 Private −0.24 .034(.06) 0.28, .599
 Public −1.16 −.071(.09) 0.63, .429
Depression (Somatic)
 Private −0.19 .015(.05) 0.09, .762
 Public −1.16 .017(.05) 0.10, .746
Trail making test A
 Private −0.15 .524(.28) 3.52, .060
 Public −1.35 .107(.28) 0.14, .704
Trail making test B
 Private −0.15 .078(.18) 0.20, .658
 Public −1.54 .205(.24) 0.75, .387
HVLT total correct
 Private −0.29 −.339(.29) 1.37, .243
 Public −1.03 .303(.40) 0.56, .453
HVLT delayed recall correct
 Private −0.23 −.195(.15) 1.62, .203
 Public −1.02 −.082(.17) 0.22, .640
HVLT true positives – false negatives
 Private −0.29 −.110(.18) 0.38, .536
 Public −1.03 .118(.22) 0.28, .595
HVLT retention percentage
 Private −0.24 −.025(.02) 1.90, .168
 Public −1.06 .006(.03) 0.06, .806

Note: ART adherence was analyzed using logistic regression. Intercepts describe the log odds of adherence at mean levels of the predictor variable, and slopes describe the change in log odds per 1 unit increase in the predictor variable. Statistically significant relationships are noted in Bold.

Note: All regression analyses controlled for differences between clinics in gender, income, and employment status. Income was grand-mean centered, and reference categories for gender and employment were male and employed.