Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 17;2015:579417. doi: 10.1155/2015/579417

Table 2.

AUC estimates calculated in ROC analyses and ROC characteristics at optimal cut-offs.

AUC (95% CI) p value Cut-off Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV NPV
ACE-R
 PD-NC versus PD-MCI 0.78 (0.66–0.90) <0.001 88.5 0.68 (0.50–0.81) 0.91 (0.69–0.98) 0.93 0.63
 PD-MCI versus PD-D 0.78 (0.63–0.93) 0.007 82.5 0.70 (0.35–0.92) 0.73 (0.56–0.86) 0.41 0.90
ACE-R AO
 PD-NC versus PD-MCI 0.64 (0.50–0.78) 0.077 17.5 0.51 (0.35–0.68) 0.73 (0.50–0.88) 0.76 0.47
 PD-MCI versus PD-D 0.92 (0.77–1.00) <0.001 15.5 0.90 (0.54–0.99) 0.97 (0.84–1.00) 0.90 0.97
ACE-R M
 PD-NC versus PD-MCI 0.68 (0.55–0.82) 0.020 22.5 0.76 (0.58–0.88) 0.50 (0.29–0.71) 0.72 0.55
 PD-MCI versus PD-D 0.71 (0.54–0.88) 0.043 20.5 0.90 (0.54–0.99) 0.46 (0.30–0.63) 0.31 0.94
ACE-R F
 PD-NC versus PD-MCI 0.75 (0.61–0.88) 0.002 11.5 0.70 (0.53–0.84) 0.73 (0.50–0.88) 0.81 0.59
 PD-MCI versus PD-D 0.62 (0.42–0.82) 0.264 8.5 0.50 (0.20–0.80) 0.76 (0.58–0.88) 0.36 0.85
ACE-R L
 PD-NC versus PD-MCI 0.62 (0.47–0.76) 0.141 24.5 0.35 (0.21–0.53) 0.91 (0.69–0.98) 0.87 0.45
 PD-MCI versus PD-D 0.56 (0.34–0.77) 0.585 23.5 0.40 (0.14–0.73) 0.84 (0.67–0.93) 0.40 0.84
ACE-R VA
 PD-NC versus PD-MCI 0.63 (0.48–0.77) 0.110 15.5 0.62 (0.45–0.77) 0.64 (0.41–0.82) 0.74 0.50
 PD-MCI versus PD-D 0.75 (0.58–0.93) 0.015 14.5 0.60 (0.27–0.86) 0.78 (0.61–0.90) 0.43 0.88

ACE-R: Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, global score.

PD-NC: subjects with Parkinson's disease with normal control.

PD-MCI: subjects with Parkinson's disease with mild cognitive impairment.

PD-D: subjects with Parkinson's disease with dementia.

ACE-R AO: Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, domain attention and orientation.

ACE-R M: Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, domain memory.

ACE-R F: Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, domain verbal fluency.

ACE-R L: Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, domain language.

ACE-R VA: Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, domain visual spatial abilities.