Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 31;6:1298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01298

Table 3.

Ratings for behavioral cues to deception as a function of interview type and veracity.

Truth tellers
Liars
Sequential
Reverse
Sequential
Reverse
Behavioral cues of deception M SD M SD p d M SD M SD p d
Cognitive demand 3.82 1.32 4.58 1.29 <0.001 0.58 3.31 1.22 3.36 1.2 0.776 0.04
How hard does the interviewee appear to be thinking?* 4.1 1.53 5.06 1.5 <0.001 0.63 3.57 1.58 3.79 1.47 0.314 0.14
How much difficulty does the interviewee appear to be having in answering the questions? 3.96 1.78 4.81 1.71 0.002 0.46 3.31 1.67 3.46 1.61 0.537 0.09
How distracted does the interviewee appear? 3.38 1.65 3.88 1.84 0.039 0.29 3.04 1.77 2.83 1.5 0.382 0.13
Anxiousness 3.71 1.38 4.34 1.57 0.007 0.43 3.28 1.54 3.24 1.35 0.852 0.03
How anxious does the interviewee appear? 4.13 1.6 4.63 1.63 0.058 0.31 3.23 1.67 3.27 1.5 0.847 0.03
How much does the interviewee appear to fidget? 3.29 1.68 4.05 1.84 0.005 0.43 3.33 1.66 3.2 1.57 0.603 0.08
Confident and convincing appearance 3.59 1.21 3.24 1.34 0.071 0.27 4.14 1.38 3.87 1.28 0.195 0.2
How detailed are the interviewee’s responses? 4.1 1.5 3.62 1.76 0.049 0.29 4.31 1.64 3.62 1.64 0.01 0.42
How spontaneous is the interviewee? 3.25 1.4 3.3 1.57 0.797 0.03 3.82 1.63 3.79 1.5 0.868 0.02
How confident does the interviewee appear? 3.25 1.61 2.83 1.57 0.1 0.26 4.27 1.65 3.92 1.72 0.171 0.21
How convincing is the interviewee? 3.77 1.7 3.2 1.68 0.023 0.34 4.15 1.83 4.17 1.54 0.965 0.01
Controlling
How controlled is the interviewee’s posture? 4.06 1.65 3.95 1.63 0.684 0.07 4.45 1.43 4.05 1.54 0.102 0.27

*There were 84 observers in total. However, there was one missing response to the “Thinking Hard” item (for truth tellers only) and “Difficulty” item (for liars only).