Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2015 Apr 7;77(4):996–1015. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12197

Table 3.

OLS regression results by two-parent family type, PPVT

Married
Biological-
Father Families
Cohabiting
Biological-
Father Families
Married
Stepfather
Families
Cohabiting
Stepfather
Families
Family income:
 Income (ln) 0.12*** (0.04) 0.07+ (0.04) 0.05 (0.13) 0.06+ (0.04)
Parental relationship quality:
 BF/SF treatment of mother (standardized) 0.08* (0.04) 0.08 (0.05) 0.47 (0.28) −0.05 (0.08)
 Coparenting quality (standardized) −0.11** (0.04) 0.00a (0.06) 0.09 (0.17) 0.07 (0.06)
Parenting quality:
 Mother spanking frequency (standardized) −0.03 (0.04) 0.09 (0.07) 0.19 (0.13) −0.03 (0.06)
 Mother engagement with child (standardized) 0.03 (0.04) 0.01 (0.07) −0.09 (0.12) 0.09 (0.06)
 BF/SF spanking frequency (standardized) −0.02 (0.04) −0.04 (0.06) −0.18 (0.15) −0.05 (0.09)
 BF/SF engagement with child (standardized) −0.00 (0.05) −0.06 (0.07) −0.03 (0.14) −0.09 (0.06)
 Constant −1.71*** (0.45) −1.11* (0.52) −1.53 (1.43) −1.33* (0.61)
Percent of total sample 48% 24% 6% 22%
Observations per imputed dataset 645 – 646 321 – 322 80 – 81 295 – 296

Note: 1341 – 1343observations per imputed dataset. Coefficients (and standard errors) presented. Outcome has been standardized to have a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1 in the full sample. The models also control for the family characteristics listed in Table 1.

a

Differs from married biological-father families at p<0.05.

b

Differs from cohabiting biological-father families at p<0. 05.

c

Differs from married stepfather families at p<0.05.